🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is seeking compensation totaling $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step is a direct warning from the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize frozen Russian state funds to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

Based on reports in local news outlets, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the stated $230 billion claim.

EU leaders are set to decide in the coming days on a proposal to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. This scheme involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and economic stability.

Most of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary custodian for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

EU authorities have maintained that their plan is legally sound. Their position is based on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in EU jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory actions, such as confiscating EU private investors' assets within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has taken on a prominent position in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

With statements interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the global financial system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to comment on the new legal action. The institution has previously stated it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

Although courts in EU countries are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian courts, analysts expect Moscow to pursue enforcement in nations with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, if such holdings can be located," commented a lawyer from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are working on steps to deter other nations from assisting any Russian legal action against European companies. Additionally, they are designing safeguards to protect EU countries with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed plan, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would solely be obligated to return the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast destruction caused during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different method for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already expressed its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it doesn't come from our public funds, which is equally significant," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful signal that when you cause all this damage to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."